Thanks. :)

Small update: I modified numbers 4 and 7, redesigned the vertical caron, and added support for Catalan.

@MarisaKirisame - Very nice recreation!  Back in the day, the 8x14 screen font was my favorite when using Microsoft Word 5 for DOS.  ;^)

29 August 2026 08:10 (BST) I New 17 thousands glyphs.

@Bryndan W. Meyerholt (BWM): Yes, I tested that version too. It didn't look good. Overall, the current design of Salice Sans is more consistent than Arial Narrow Bold or Impact.

Next: I need a pretty ogonek.

@SquareOctent That's an affricate, which is usually written with a tie bar, but it can be omitted as long as it doesn't create ambiguity. Affricates were historically written as ligatures, but that was dropped in 1989.

I meant like copy the dot that's on the lowercase i, j; then use that on the other letters with the dot diacritic

@Bryndan W. Meyerholt (BWM): Thank you for your comment. You dropped a pebble into my calm and settled pond and stirred up a lot of things. As a result, I made the dot the same size across the font, redesigned

@Bryndan W. Meyerholt (BWM): That's a very good point. It should be the same-size single dot, indeed. The dots of the diaeresis can be smaller. What about the middle dot for Catalan?

For the dot diacritic, I wonder if it's possible to use the same dot that's on the lowercase i and j for consistency?

can someone clone this and finish kerning

hey nug what did you say

@marcotoa: I saw you working on this large project. Your dedication is admirable. However, we need to address some fundamental issues with consistency,

Glyphset 

V1.5

Version 1.3

Am I right?

This is what I should’ve interpreted 

Is it a good idea for me to design the et character to remove the bottom descender hook or not

How about do I need to redesign the “et” or that’s fine enough. 

I have updated the following glyphs: N, v, w, and 7. The capital N is a bit wider and feels more natural. The lowercase w looked especially feeble;

@marcotoa You appear to have misinterpreted my comment. I did not say that Հ (Ho) resembled Ը (Et), I said that Ը (Et) resembled Հ (Ho) because of the part

i guess you could say this is… twelvetica

To summarise, in modern Armenian fonts, using the R-without-vertical stroke is increasingly seen as a major design faux-pas.

test of diacritics, note that this rule is not applicable to the diaeresis or the macron etc because it takes ONE y pixel only.

There is a formula where for two-pixel height diacritics, like an acute, tilde, grave, circumflex (aka caret), ring etc should take 0.5 y pixel for

For accented characters, I decided that the ring in the letter Å should not be attached onto the top of the letter A because it can lead to inconsistency with the

Similarly, it is strongly discouraged to use f for "ք" or r for "ր".

Recently I realised that the "R-without-straight-line" variant was an anomaly that is, created in the late 20th century after the rise of Unicode, because typographers were struggling to make the traditional zigzag

It is based on the Segoe UI or SF Armenian style

The Armenian* capitalised Հ, ho does not resemble Ը

@four: Thank you for your feedback. I studied a few tall and slim fonts, and learned how to manage tight spaces or extreme angles. I'll make a few sample pics later.

PS.: Where is Elmo? Does anybody know it?

Your approach to A, K, M, N, R, V, W, X, Y and the inclusion of inktraps work well.

@Patrick H. Lauke (redux) - That's an interesting design for the ‘A’.  If the ‘R’ wasn't so distinct, that's what I would have thought it might be -- an ‘R’ !