Sorry to break it to you, but that's a pixel display.
HE CLONED WITH OUT CHANGING!!!!!!
@Tv boy aero (digitalio-2) - Look again. He modified the numerals.
It seems there´s a minimal change... but is that even OK?
@ACoolShapeFontMaker i think that, if it is 15%-80% changed it should be valid
323/(5/100 which is 20)=16, 16*3=48 glyphs changed, added, removed.
only 10 glyphs have been changed, making this potentially not ok.
i know that this is subjectiv
@ACoolShapeFontMaker - A change is a change, no matter how minimal. Like it or not, this is the risk where cloning is allowed (clones with no changes or minimal changes).
@everyone exactly
@ACoolShapeFontMaker: Yes
Please sign in to comment.
8 Comments
Sorry to break it to you, but that's a pixel display.
HE CLONED WITH OUT CHANGING!!!!!!
@Tv boy aero (digitalio-2) - Look again. He modified the numerals.
It seems there´s a minimal change... but is that even OK?
@ACoolShapeFontMaker i think that, if it is 15%-80% changed it should be valid
323/(5/100 which is 20)=16, 16*3=48 glyphs changed, added, removed.
only 10 glyphs have been changed, making this potentially not ok.
i know that this is subjectiv
@ACoolShapeFontMaker - A change is a change, no matter how minimal. Like it or not, this is the risk where cloning is allowed (clones with no changes or minimal changes).
@everyone exactly
@ACoolShapeFontMaker: Yes
Please sign in to comment.